North Arm Movement:
* Periodic Impulse
**
March 14, 2009
an armed group to be considered as such, is bound to act militarily, but when this happens, doubts and suspicion overshadow anything else that defines it. This is the case of North Armed Movement (MAN), which recently claimed the helicopter sabotage of the National Water Commission (CNA) in which carrying the owner of that body, José Luis Luege Tamargo. Therefore, in this case is in doubt the veracity of both issues: the existence and authorship.
Known about the MAN from the first of January this year for three releases and a military part and while secured in the first one that its existence dates back to 2006 can not register a prior action under another name. In his writings
also fails to accurately decipher their ideology, because the wording used is unclear, but may be a deliberate strategy. However, there are at least two definitions that are useful to attempt a tentative approach. In the first of his texts ("Declaration of War", January 1) states that "initiate action against the Government of Mexico, sabotaging its fragile political system, more no country's economic productivity. "
This is a very clear reference to the explosions produced by the Popular Revolutionary Army (EPR) against the pipelines of Petroleos Mexicanos (PEMEX) in July and September 2007 and gained momentum when a few paragraphs down is in breach when he underlines that "is willing to continue and if so to start work with the various armed groups and movements and the Left, both in Mexico and Latin America, and that our struggle is the same." In the following letter ("Second release of MAN", 24 January), an endorsement can be read almost in identical words that definition.
A second element that stands out above the rest is the emphasis on the work of infiltration (of any underground organization itself) and other features of subversive war alongside the development of new tools to carry out these tasks, movement defined as "revolutionary" new generation. Particularly in its second article also said: "Our movement was born with the conviction that the revolutionary wars in the world have changed and today the armed struggle against the state have other elements, ie, the insurgent forces and do not move en masse and not collectively face the Regular Forces. Due to this, and aware that the number of guns and fighters and do not make a significant difference, our Movement operates on the elements of the infiltration, using the arms of the Information, Information Warfare Weapons, Weapons of Political Warfare, Weapons of Legal War and Weapons of sabotage, which are these ever more painful for the state. "This, however, is not a novelty from the Mexican guerrillas.
In fact, in today's Mexico guerrilla avoids direct confrontation (particularly since 2000) does not control territory and neither have it, but that drives the development of cells with a high degree of autonomy (the MAN ago some reference to this issue), non-territorial, with capacity for mobilization in different parts of Mexico (apparently unrelated to each other) without betting on a settling in regions that historically have been present and exploring new places for the development of their actions and policies. In this regard, blowing up pipelines PEMEX occurred in areas where the guerrillas have not been present (at least this "new generation" of organizations) and has been a sort of baptism of fire in this mode.
The current guerrilla territories but does not release that briefly passes and one of the reasons is that the drug and criminal gangs dominate these geographies. Technological advances applied to the counter, his weakness after the divisions and state stalking for joint operations are other factors that precipitated the use of such resources and movements.
In his third statement ("position against drug trafficking and militarization," Feb. 25) are not definitions about how to end the drug, although devoted an entire text on the subject and militarization. Text dealing with complaints and distance themselves from this scourge, but if it's an organization where its geographical area is north of the country, this is not enough. What's more is expected of such an organization definitions more robust and conclusive, as the threat is nearby. Report militarization may well prove another statement facade and is one of the aspects that the MAN should be clarified to ensure credibility and show that really is what it says and nothing else, this, too, because the non-militarization is only an obstacle to the guerrilla organizations. But the more complex issue is the sabotage of the helicopter, because this not real enough to consider its existence or authorship. On the contrary, examples abound where the action is not enough for a definition: a couple of years ago, another group that met some writings Forces Armed Southeast (FAS), claimed the downing of the helicopter carrying the governor of Oaxaca, Ulises Ruiz Ortiz. Much further back, between 1999-2000, another group, the Frente Amplio del Sur (FAS again but can not be considered to be dealing with the same initials), also claimed a similar action, but this time in Campeche.
These cases tend to confirm the existence of previous examples but over time did little to elucidate the phenomenon was registered but the fact that those groups never was heard. In fact, not to speak publicly again. Therefore, the veracity of the claim as well as the character "revolutionary" have been hopelessly diluted.
Nothing less than their claims are being called into question: MAN actually sabotaged the helicopter? In a region crisscrossed by various acts of violence, but where the drug premium and organized crime, the existence and actions of a guerrilla organization are factors that will come, inevitably, on distrust. Their continued existence in doubt, as many other ads with similar characteristics, but in this case even more, because the claim itself can project an image of strength, determination and operation but in parallel rather increases distrust of credibility. Continuity over time, the social and popular call which commands around, and in the short term, the detailed explanation of the reasons and supporting political projects are tasks facing all revolutionary organization is defined as the MAN himself .
In this sense, because the drug traffickers and criminal gangs have been, and continue to do so, various non-traditional forms of expression and action (the narcobanners is just one of them, perhaps the most striking, but by no means the only) is possible to equate this situation to other expressions that can be observed equally in other parts of the republic.
Other cases, it is worth recognizing are coarser, also take stands that at first sight or carelessly can be characterized as revolutionary but which actually have nothing to do with political or social ideals.
For all this, the MAN did not break with his ghostly condition or ephemeral. Only the continuity of its production policy will resolve this situation, meanwhile, will be considered an isolated event that will raise suspicion, subjected to all kinds of speculation and to be linked to other phenomena. Moreover, even when they show that their scope should not be bounded to the local reality, if their existence and authorship are real then the state policies and / or regional are not enough to explain his presence at such a conflict.
Moreover, the objective (sabotage or attack) is the national advocacy, as they say in his second statement, and even the claim argued in his writings also wants to look the same scope. Moreover, if again we consider this to be true, then it must be addressed in two months became a threat risk. Attack a human target, sabotage of the helicopter, although not entirely clear in his text ("Press Release, March 3) whether it was sabotage or an attack, which is not the same sabotage the machine by a shot tear it down, is a considerable change in what it refers to the illegal act but does not define for itself the property of the action. A white man, an officer in this case, it is not the same as attacking other goal: it expresses a political one completely different. And although they note that prevented the death of innocents can never be under control in an action of this nature this very sensitive issue.
As cyclical data (whose intrinsic value is only that) remains to understand that if it is true that the MAN was announced earlier this year, The claim of responsibility occurs almost simultaneously with the visit of Chief of Joint Staff of the U.S. to the country, Admiral Michael Mullen, who met privately with the secretaries of the Navy and the Mexican National Defense, where he emphasized that Mexicans need support in understanding, skills and tactics that have evolved for us in our fight against terrorist networks in the world "(Reforma, March 7).
addition to this, include an error, or definitely a contradiction between the time of drafting the final text and sabotage. This is dated March 3, and notes on time, which was written purposely days after the fact. But mention that the sabotage took place on 28 February, which can be determined with the journalistic and even the CNA Web site (which also describes the specifications of the helicopter that mentions the MAN in his text), ie three days earlier. His argument is "not to demonstrate the operation and the elements involved in it." But that same stress that "the MAN recognized to be an actor of such events that constitute the new war made five days after." The 5 day meet is the fifth since the bombing, was the day that the text was distributed via email, but the authorship is dated two days earlier. In the midst of so much suspicion, that is a fact not lost.
But if it is a staging, which always demands the widest possible dissemination, the MAN is little or nothing to what has been said and said, both in Mexico and the U.S.. Moreover, if the most striking fact was the claim of responsibility for the sabotage, he has not transcended almost any media.
Five or six years ago, another group that was announced as a guerrilla in the same areas as now done by the MAN, the Regional Reconstruction Army (which had to make a list of politicians putting "price to head ") suffered the same fate and, closer in time and contemporary in this group, Citizens for Juarez Command, which drew attention to indicate their intention to kill an offender per day, also appears to have been forgotten, at least for now. Resta to note that on the group and its claim, the authorities have not established its position as shown or in other situations, reserving only to qualify the incident as an "accident" and that its causes "are evaluated and dictated by the corresponding ( CNA, Press Release No. 027-09, 28 February).
The fight against drug trafficking and organized crime, particularly in the north, dominate the information about the region that regularly win the eight columns and tend to "contaminate" the rest of the events, where this case is no exception. And for the MAN is particularly negative, which will link with the drug prior to define it as guerrillas.
* Researcher, Center for Documentation of Armed Movements ( www.cedema.org ). **
Mexico State Journal. On the Internet, the article is available as a PDF file on page http://cedema.org/ver.php?id=3130 .
Tuesday, March 17, 2009
Wednesday, January 7, 2009
Pattycake Wearing Black T-shirt In Shower
doubts Bush Saving Private Nevertheless
My article this month.
Saving Private Bush
Jesus Gerardo Monroy
erathora@gmail.com
Before leaving the U.S. president, George Bush II came to visit on Sunday December 14 in the country that invaded and destroyed: Iraq, where thousands of Americans and a million Iraqis have been massacred. No sooner had he stepped on Baghdad, the president-emperor held a press conference, but this was interrupted by one of the audience to be heard in loud voices: here's a gift from Iraqi people, take your kiss goodbye, dog! The two became man shoes skimming Bush's ears while Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri Kamal al-Maliki, was preparing to protect the face of "gringo" with their hands. This is part of widows, orphans and all those who have died in Iraq! , he again heard a cry Arabic. Mal recovered from his surprise, the guards set upon Bush Muntazer Al-Zaidi, 29, Iraqi reporter who serves as the satellite television channel Al-Bagdadiya.
are the facts. The following are interpretations of facts.
director Milenio Diario, Carlos Marin, is the author of a column, The assault on reason , which reviewed the incident in Baghdad on Tuesday 16 ("Sequel to the Zapatazos"), on Thursday 18 ("espadazo to zapatocaso ") and Friday 19 (" The streams of Al-Zaidi. ") The lazy column Marin rarely extends beyond two or three short paragraphs, but 18 and 19 were especially relaxed for the columnist, it limited its work to copy an article from the English newspaper El Mundo ("barefoot journalism" Wednesday 17) signed by Arcadi Espada. Phrases selected by Marin says Espada -After qualifying as a "mess" the action of Al-Zaidi ": "[...] I would not have left the prison I had behaved with the same uninhibited luxury that my colleague [Al-Zaidi]. I missed (or miss me) desire. But obviously, the journalist in a press conference before installing liars, corrupt murderers should not remove their shoes [...]. Muntazer Al-Zaidi did nothing to break a sacred principle of their profession: the inability to become news. "
Who is this swordsman of journalism, he asks the Mexican reader, who is this gentleman diagnosed Sword "mess" an Iraqi exasperated and barefoot? Where followed the ethics lessons in good time is sentenced to give us?
The scholar and photographer
Excelsior newspaper, which published the December 1 interview with him in the supplement mole Code, presents Enériz Arcadi Espada (Barcelona, \u200b\u200b1957) as an "academic and journalist used to reflect the subject [sic] [of terrorism] with sententious tone, and solid critical [sic]. The student of communication and journalism professor at the University Pompeu Fabra in Barcelona, \u200b\u200balthough often controversial (as when published criticism of a photograph taken by Pulitzer Prize Javier Bauluz) has been a contributor to newspapers like La Vanguardia, Barcelona, \u200b\u200bEl Pais and currently, The World. " Millennium Marin added in the blog * Sword is "highly respected and popular in Spain."
While generalizations which aims to rapidly introduce Mexican clientele in the world of sword (a small universe, we'll see), we can consider valid the Millennium and Excelsior statements just quoted. But the inquisitive reader requires us to be more precise, requires us to answer, for example, what was critical Arcadi and Javier Bauluz Excelsior which relates them to an alleged "controversial" Sword? Bauluz
had received the award in 2001 Godo photojournalism, by capturing the image of a man and a woman who was sunning on a beach in Cadiz in front of a dead immigrant. The image was published in the supplement The Magazine of the Catalan newspaper La Vanguardia, and on the cover of the New York Times. Arcadi, in his book Daily , test Espasa Prize 2002, reproduced the photo without permission Bauluz and derisively referred to as "essential demiurge" and "gentle man dedicated to professionally destroyed" as well as talk about "Docility that makes big guys like Bauluz, able to hunt rabbits like two swimmers unnoticed that they may be praying quietly over the body of an immigrant [...]; Fortunately, the body was not a poor white-not Bauluz would have taken much advantage. " Bauluz Espada accused of deliberately exclude from the photo staff of State in charge of collecting the body, so as to induce the illusion of closeness between the couple and the body. Excelsior
said that the "academic and journalist" is "controversial" less than that: Arcadi, is simply a liar. As never substantiate its charges proveyera against the photographer, the Consell de la Informació de Catalunya in May 2003 ruled that the statements of scholarship on Bauluz are "false, unfair and beyond reason" and violate the code of ethics of the journalistic profession in Catalonia. Espada, still recalls his articles sometimes conflict with Bauluz and still pondering his anger and shame.
But then there is the remark made Muntazer Al-Zaidi for breaking the "sacred principle of journalism is" the impossibility of building it becomes a news [...] himself with his own action calculated. Neglecting FACT (fact) and embracing his corruption, factoid: a fact that only exists if it displays. " Well, nothing else did on Gerona on "academic and journalist" (and political) Sword the June 5, 2006, when the head of the association acted Ciutadans de Catalunya provocations against the Catalan independence movement. Espada, other Ciutadans independence and its rivals have suffered physical and verbal, but the English press picked up the complaints only and nobody Ciutadans of Maulets (youth Catalan independence).
The assault on reason
Desinformado by "official versions", Carlos Marín misinform its readers. In his column on Friday, 19 says, "three days after launching his brash [Al-Zaidi] wrote to the Prime Minister acknowledging his country" is now too late to lament the huge and ugly action that I made, "but" I ask ...»". forgiveness However, a brother Muntazer, Uday, interviewed by Al-Bagdadiya, denied the U.S. and Iraqi presidents, whose "parts" Articles-based Marin: "My brother just told me that the government never sent apologies." Muntazer, Uday says, does not regret what he did.
Marín and Sword They complain that "the usual orgy of hypocritical" does not say anything (!) "Naturally" (?) On the treacherous use that would have given the Iraqi to his craft: "Muntazer Al-Zaidi he threw his shoes at Bush because he came to stand a few feet away, and access to that distance, so confianzuda and hearty, he gave his profession as a journalist. " But who else but a journalist is in Iraq the possibility of launching in the face of these truths pointed emperor who did not want to know? Have not you noticed Mexican English and the serious humanitarian crisis in which, for a wound bleeding our planet, global social crisis that George Bush II is the most notorious culprit?
In a situation of disease and poison, deep agony as we are facing, is it not too long time to keep our "keeping up appearances? Will we continue to perpetuate the split between the journalist and the citizen? At what point castrated journalists not to recognize the right of rebellion, a right which earns more than the shortness of the law?
George Bush, who should respond to a tribunal for crimes against humanity, will release the rest of his life, health joyful, full of riches. The young journalist who said, let the outrage itself reflective of a human being, but the inescapable wrath of a living creature, the young journalist is in jail, guilty of throwing a shoe.
* Blog: notebook is updated to suit the author via the Internet.
My article this month.
Saving Private Bush
Jesus Gerardo Monroy
erathora@gmail.com
Before leaving the U.S. president, George Bush II came to visit on Sunday December 14 in the country that invaded and destroyed: Iraq, where thousands of Americans and a million Iraqis have been massacred. No sooner had he stepped on Baghdad, the president-emperor held a press conference, but this was interrupted by one of the audience to be heard in loud voices: here's a gift from Iraqi people, take your kiss goodbye, dog! The two became man shoes skimming Bush's ears while Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri Kamal al-Maliki, was preparing to protect the face of "gringo" with their hands. This is part of widows, orphans and all those who have died in Iraq! , he again heard a cry Arabic. Mal recovered from his surprise, the guards set upon Bush Muntazer Al-Zaidi, 29, Iraqi reporter who serves as the satellite television channel Al-Bagdadiya.
are the facts. The following are interpretations of facts.
director Milenio Diario, Carlos Marin, is the author of a column, The assault on reason , which reviewed the incident in Baghdad on Tuesday 16 ("Sequel to the Zapatazos"), on Thursday 18 ("espadazo to zapatocaso ") and Friday 19 (" The streams of Al-Zaidi. ") The lazy column Marin rarely extends beyond two or three short paragraphs, but 18 and 19 were especially relaxed for the columnist, it limited its work to copy an article from the English newspaper El Mundo ("barefoot journalism" Wednesday 17) signed by Arcadi Espada. Phrases selected by Marin says Espada -After qualifying as a "mess" the action of Al-Zaidi ": "[...] I would not have left the prison I had behaved with the same uninhibited luxury that my colleague [Al-Zaidi]. I missed (or miss me) desire. But obviously, the journalist in a press conference before installing liars, corrupt murderers should not remove their shoes [...]. Muntazer Al-Zaidi did nothing to break a sacred principle of their profession: the inability to become news. "
Who is this swordsman of journalism, he asks the Mexican reader, who is this gentleman diagnosed Sword "mess" an Iraqi exasperated and barefoot? Where followed the ethics lessons in good time is sentenced to give us?
The scholar and photographer
Excelsior newspaper, which published the December 1 interview with him in the supplement mole Code, presents Enériz Arcadi Espada (Barcelona, \u200b\u200b1957) as an "academic and journalist used to reflect the subject [sic] [of terrorism] with sententious tone, and solid critical [sic]. The student of communication and journalism professor at the University Pompeu Fabra in Barcelona, \u200b\u200balthough often controversial (as when published criticism of a photograph taken by Pulitzer Prize Javier Bauluz) has been a contributor to newspapers like La Vanguardia, Barcelona, \u200b\u200bEl Pais and currently, The World. " Millennium Marin added in the blog * Sword is "highly respected and popular in Spain."
While generalizations which aims to rapidly introduce Mexican clientele in the world of sword (a small universe, we'll see), we can consider valid the Millennium and Excelsior statements just quoted. But the inquisitive reader requires us to be more precise, requires us to answer, for example, what was critical Arcadi and Javier Bauluz Excelsior which relates them to an alleged "controversial" Sword? Bauluz
had received the award in 2001 Godo photojournalism, by capturing the image of a man and a woman who was sunning on a beach in Cadiz in front of a dead immigrant. The image was published in the supplement The Magazine of the Catalan newspaper La Vanguardia, and on the cover of the New York Times. Arcadi, in his book Daily , test Espasa Prize 2002, reproduced the photo without permission Bauluz and derisively referred to as "essential demiurge" and "gentle man dedicated to professionally destroyed" as well as talk about "Docility that makes big guys like Bauluz, able to hunt rabbits like two swimmers unnoticed that they may be praying quietly over the body of an immigrant [...]; Fortunately, the body was not a poor white-not Bauluz would have taken much advantage. " Bauluz Espada accused of deliberately exclude from the photo staff of State in charge of collecting the body, so as to induce the illusion of closeness between the couple and the body. Excelsior
said that the "academic and journalist" is "controversial" less than that: Arcadi, is simply a liar. As never substantiate its charges proveyera against the photographer, the Consell de la Informació de Catalunya in May 2003 ruled that the statements of scholarship on Bauluz are "false, unfair and beyond reason" and violate the code of ethics of the journalistic profession in Catalonia. Espada, still recalls his articles sometimes conflict with Bauluz and still pondering his anger and shame.
But then there is the remark made Muntazer Al-Zaidi for breaking the "sacred principle of journalism is" the impossibility of building it becomes a news [...] himself with his own action calculated. Neglecting FACT (fact) and embracing his corruption, factoid: a fact that only exists if it displays. " Well, nothing else did on Gerona on "academic and journalist" (and political) Sword the June 5, 2006, when the head of the association acted Ciutadans de Catalunya provocations against the Catalan independence movement. Espada, other Ciutadans independence and its rivals have suffered physical and verbal, but the English press picked up the complaints only and nobody Ciutadans of Maulets (youth Catalan independence).
The assault on reason
Desinformado by "official versions", Carlos Marín misinform its readers. In his column on Friday, 19 says, "three days after launching his brash [Al-Zaidi] wrote to the Prime Minister acknowledging his country" is now too late to lament the huge and ugly action that I made, "but" I ask ...»". forgiveness However, a brother Muntazer, Uday, interviewed by Al-Bagdadiya, denied the U.S. and Iraqi presidents, whose "parts" Articles-based Marin: "My brother just told me that the government never sent apologies." Muntazer, Uday says, does not regret what he did.
Marín and Sword They complain that "the usual orgy of hypocritical" does not say anything (!) "Naturally" (?) On the treacherous use that would have given the Iraqi to his craft: "Muntazer Al-Zaidi he threw his shoes at Bush because he came to stand a few feet away, and access to that distance, so confianzuda and hearty, he gave his profession as a journalist. " But who else but a journalist is in Iraq the possibility of launching in the face of these truths pointed emperor who did not want to know? Have not you noticed Mexican English and the serious humanitarian crisis in which, for a wound bleeding our planet, global social crisis that George Bush II is the most notorious culprit?
In a situation of disease and poison, deep agony as we are facing, is it not too long time to keep our "keeping up appearances? Will we continue to perpetuate the split between the journalist and the citizen? At what point castrated journalists not to recognize the right of rebellion, a right which earns more than the shortness of the law?
George Bush, who should respond to a tribunal for crimes against humanity, will release the rest of his life, health joyful, full of riches. The young journalist who said, let the outrage itself reflective of a human being, but the inescapable wrath of a living creature, the young journalist is in jail, guilty of throwing a shoe.
* Blog: notebook is updated to suit the author via the Internet.
Thursday, December 25, 2008
Where To Buy Invitation Cards Near Ha0 1ta
. .. Uncle
Nevertheless ...
... Merry Christmas to all visitors to the blog!
is more: Merry Christmas everyone, though this world not knowing.
And very happy (really) in 2009.
Nevertheless ...
... Merry Christmas to all visitors to the blog! is more: Merry Christmas everyone, though this world not knowing.
And very happy (really) in 2009.
Cartoon Allan McDonald published today in the portal Rebellion.
Friday, December 12, 2008
Cherry Red Used In Walls
Erat invites you to enjoy a hilarious video
Prepare popcorn but to throw up, because in fact the video is nothing funny, but rather as giving a very genuine Asquith.
PRD spots apologizes to
crocodilians is moving to the point of tears to see Jesus Ortega and Ruth Zavaleta apologizing, but not by thousands of pesos tax reclaim them just to delegates of all parties. No, the reason why you apologize, friend reader-voter is "to make you feel (sic) that politicians live dividing" .
all know to whom they refer: the only political leader who is not afraid to mix with people when it comes to defending the economic and political rights of the most disadvantaged of the population. The only one who said before the 2006 election that was worth being very rigorous in the defense of a natural resource so important to our country as it is oil.
remember when my grandmother asked for forgiveness in the church not only for the sins she committed, but for those who may have committed their children and grandchildren, and I thought, but if my sins! I had a hard time committing them! Just to make a little sin will require years of careful meticulous strategy and personal development of evil! López Obrador could ask Jesus (aka "The Christ?) Ortega, Carlos Navarrete and Ruth Pantaleta (worth a second my macho adjectives) please do not walk usurping sins of others and not ask forgiveness for past wrongs they did not commit and noble souls as pure as theirs.
If people perceive that politicians "live divided, not due to López Obrador, is due to the work of the two party preferred by the big bourgeoisie, the PAN and the PRI. And in equal measure, is due to the hard work disinformation media of the bourgeois, parasitic, virtually everyone. Almost none is saved.
Also, do you really believe the idiots apologizing PRD will win more votes? By the dog! How long have you been Sexy apologize? What about the little girl cejoncita (very tender it why or why) when awkwardly pronounce the word "privatization"? Somehow we are saying, "I do not know a pendejita pronouncing a word more than four syllables; drain slime like a snail, the education they gave me Gordillo earned yards." Besides, I never leave my daughter in the care of Uncle Chuck, with the lascivious gaze of his eyes down greedily. That is child abuse.
M and comforting to think that this child will one day win a lawsuit against his parents consented to have it look like a mentally deficient. E
n Coahuila context, the worst is that those who fail to vote the PRD has only two "natural" alternatives: the PT and Convergencia parties that they registration has been removed in our institution .
"do have to apologize López Obrador, who is really who is blaming this spot, more than" espot "is" sputum "? Do not tell dirty word, see the dictionary . Come to my mind more than three tactical errors López Obrador, who perhaps would merit an apology on your part, but what should apologize López Obrador p or defend the right of millions of Mexicans to publicly express their complaints? Should you apologize for follow-rather than head-to millions of Mexicans demanding their political rights violated since the 2006 presidential election ? Asking forgiveness for going out? Why refuse to make electoral reform a sham energy, as they would like the PAN, the PRI and an embarrassing fraction of the PRD, which is what today is getting these spots ?
When the PRD is gone, it will be very soon, Uncle Chuck and his gang have to make a new spot where we ask for forgiveness, now in his own name.
Prepare popcorn but to throw up, because in fact the video is nothing funny, but rather as giving a very genuine Asquith.
PRD spots apologizes to
crocodilians is moving to the point of tears to see Jesus Ortega and Ruth Zavaleta apologizing, but not by thousands of pesos tax reclaim them just to delegates of all parties. No, the reason why you apologize, friend reader-voter is "to make you feel (sic) that politicians live dividing" .
all know to whom they refer: the only political leader who is not afraid to mix with people when it comes to defending the economic and political rights of the most disadvantaged of the population. The only one who said before the 2006 election that was worth being very rigorous in the defense of a natural resource so important to our country as it is oil.
remember when my grandmother asked for forgiveness in the church not only for the sins she committed, but for those who may have committed their children and grandchildren, and I thought, but if my sins! I had a hard time committing them! Just to make a little sin will require years of careful meticulous strategy and personal development of evil! López Obrador could ask Jesus (aka "The Christ?) Ortega, Carlos Navarrete and Ruth Pantaleta (worth a second my macho adjectives) please do not walk usurping sins of others and not ask forgiveness for past wrongs they did not commit and noble souls as pure as theirs.
If people perceive that politicians "live divided, not due to López Obrador, is due to the work of the two party preferred by the big bourgeoisie, the PAN and the PRI. And in equal measure, is due to the hard work disinformation media of the bourgeois, parasitic, virtually everyone. Almost none is saved.
Also, do you really believe the idiots apologizing PRD will win more votes? By the dog! How long have you been Sexy apologize? What about the little girl cejoncita (very tender it why or why) when awkwardly pronounce the word "privatization"? Somehow we are saying, "I do not know a pendejita pronouncing a word more than four syllables; drain slime like a snail, the education they gave me Gordillo earned yards." Besides, I never leave my daughter in the care of Uncle Chuck, with the lascivious gaze of his eyes down greedily. That is child abuse.
M and comforting to think that this child will one day win a lawsuit against his parents consented to have it look like a mentally deficient. E
n Coahuila context, the worst is that those who fail to vote the PRD has only two "natural" alternatives: the PT and Convergencia parties that they registration has been removed in our institution .
"do have to apologize López Obrador, who is really who is blaming this spot, more than" espot "is" sputum "? Do not tell dirty word, see the dictionary . Come to my mind more than three tactical errors López Obrador, who perhaps would merit an apology on your part, but what should apologize López Obrador p or defend the right of millions of Mexicans to publicly express their complaints? Should you apologize for follow-rather than head-to millions of Mexicans demanding their political rights violated since the 2006 presidential election ? Asking forgiveness for going out? Why refuse to make electoral reform a sham energy, as they would like the PAN, the PRI and an embarrassing fraction of the PRD, which is what today is getting these spots ?
When the PRD is gone, it will be very soon, Uncle Chuck and his gang have to make a new spot where we ask for forgiveness, now in his own name.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)